I was initially going to do a paper about how twitter is destroying children, but I was captivated by another paper I found while doing my research. The paper is titled, “The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades”.The essay discusses an experiment that is conducted in order to analyze the effect of twitter in the classroom. The paper concludes that twitter can be beneficial in the college setting, because of how it is used to engage students on the topics discussed in class. The article conducts an experiment within a college classroom setting that tests how twitter interaction helps with interaction on the topics being discussed. The ultimate conclusion is that twitter can be beneficial it just has to be monitored, and it also depends on the students. Twitter therefore allows the students to think about the subject matter for a longer amount of time, and with the use of different platforms.
I am conflicted about what genre I should do for the younger audience. I either want to write a picture book sort of horror story where twitter is originally this spooky character, because no one was willing to make friends with him. After the kids find out that the spooky character is actually a cute puppy that was covered in mud. The moral of the story would be something super corny like, “You can find friends where you least expect them”, or “Don’t judge a book by its cover”. I would use simple language to write it and keep the tone light. There would be a happy ending of course! Also, I’ve noticed that children’s books don’t have that many characters because children get confused with complex storylines, so I’ll keep the story straight-forward. The age group I’ll probably write for is the five to six year range when kids are learning how to read.
I am also interested in the whole tween magazine universe. I collected stacks of magazines after our school did a fundraiser that involved selling magazine subscriptions. One of my favorite magazines was Tiger Beat. The cover was filled with Disney Stars ranging from Miley Cyrus, the Jonas Brothers, and Zac Efron. Each issue promised that it would contain the latest scoop, so I would advertise the same thing in my article. I would use slang and make sure that I call out “grown ups” for being “totally lame” for trying to be cool by using twitter to appeal to a younger audience. The point of this article will most likely be to warn tweens that adults are trying to infiltrate the sacred grounds that they use to share their stream of consciousness to the world, and advise them to start using a new platform. I will include fake quotes about what popular teen celebrities think about adults joining twitter to reinforce my argument. After all, how can a tween argue with Tiger Beat when celebrities like (insert teen celebrity I will find) agree with the fact that twitter is meant for people under 25 only.
I will transform the twitter issue into a parenting article in a magazine. “How to Tweet Like Your Kid”. I will use outdated terms and vague assumptions that other parents often make when referring to children. I will have a formal tone, but when it comes to the example tweets I will try to imitate an adult that is trying to sound younger than they really are. I will include examples of how to format a tweet, and how to make a tweet effective even with the 140 character limitation. I have noticed that a lot of parenting “how to” guides are geared towards an audience of adults that seek out to feel more connected to the children. So I will promise within the article that using twitter correctly is guaranteed to fortify the connection between parent and child.
I think the picture book/horror story idea is an interesting allegorical take on the relationship that people (children in particular, or college students in particular?) have with twitter. To me, that implies that twitter is initially seen to be this bad thing for people (for children or for college students,or for everybody in general?), but turns out to be non-threatening, lovable, and even beneficial in some ways. I am a little confused about the topic--I know it is "twitter," but is it the surprising positive impact of twitter on college students, or "twitter" in general? If it is about the surprising positive effect on college students, then I am a little confused about what the topic is about for the older audience, and how it ties back into the main articles' intention. I am also confused about what the main article is about, I think these issues will clear up when a summary is provided.
ReplyDeleteJosue,
ReplyDeleteA little more info about this piece could’ve helped me, potentially, offer more valuable feedback but I’ll try. (What was the experiment? How do they think it can be used effectively in the classroom? What was ineffective from their perspective, and why?)
Alright, so I really dig how creatively you’re thinking here—I certainly wasn’t expecting to read about Twitter/education being transformed into a horror story, but it seems to capture part of what was happening in the scholarly piece. My question to you is: what do you want to bring out from the article, and why? Is this Twitter-can-be-your-friend the moral of the researchers’ piece? If so, HOW, exactly? HOW is Twitter someone’s (educational) friend? I think you’d need to be crystal-clear about that within the plot of the story if you wanted that to come across cleanly.
You don’t need to stick with super-young kids, either, fyi—could high schoolers benefit from learning more about how to use Twitter? Could they use it to study more effectively? If so, how/why, and for what class/subject/grade level?
A “How To” guide is a neat idea—although they don’t always make assumptions about what the “damn kids” are doing and they’re not always boring/“formal”. My question is: how do this How To guide align with the original scholarly source? What does this genre have in common with that piece? Why do these adults want to learn how to use Twitter, and why do you think they don’t already know how to?
Is there a better audience than just parents? (And parents of whom, exactly? Specific kinds of children?) Ask yourself: (1) what am I really trying to capture here, and (2) who is my specific audience and why?
Z
Hi I think you may have been confused about who wrote this, but this is Beatriz! and thank you I asked in class about the summary aspect of the paper, and I thought I had update the new version, but I never saved it. So my bad. Thank you for the feeback anyways! I know my PB was confusing because of my lack of detail about the research paper I am basing this all on.
DeleteAhhh. Sorry, Beatriz -- I definitely got confused there. (In fact, I thought Josue deleted my feedback and created a whole new PB3A . Bad Zack.)
ReplyDeleteThanks for clearing that up, sister.
Z
I actually did my WP2 on this topic! How crazy! Out of your two choices for the younger audience I think the Tiger Beat idea is more relevant. I think it works better because you are actually using Twitter as the evidence rather than disguising it. Also, I like it because it would be beneficial for tweens to engage with academics in a “fun and hip” way. Would you pretend to be a celeb that has recently graduated and learned about using this technique while in college? As far as the adult audience I think a parent magazine idea because adults are typically concerned with what’s going on in social media. But, is the scholarly article addressing “how to tweet”? I think you could you could still use the parenting magazine platform but maybe tie it back to getting parents to understand why Twitter is an up and coming teaching method.
ReplyDeleteWanna wiseabove?
ReplyDeleteWould you puh-leeze help a 'Plethora Of Wurdz' [POW!] which are look'n for a new home in your novel? Yay! Whew...
Q: Can anyone tell me the difference between K2 and IQ? A: Nthn. In Seventh-Heaven, we gitt'm both for eternity HawrHawr Need a few more thots, ideers, raw wurdz or ironclad iconoclasms? Voila!!
VERBUM SAT SAPIENTI: As an ex-writer of the sassy, savvy, schizophenia we all go through in this lifelong demise, I just wanna help U.S. git past the whorizontal more!ass! we're in (Latin: words to [the] wise)...
"This finite existence is only a test, son," God Almighty told me in my coma. "Far beyond thy earthly tempest is where you'll find tangible, corpulent eloquence". Lemme tella youse without d'New Joisey accent...
I actually saw Seventh-Heaven when we died: you couldn't GET any moe curly, party-hardy-endorphins, extravagantly-surplus-lush Upstairs (in [the] end without end -Saint Augustine) when my beautifull, brilliant, bombastic girly-girl passed-away due to those wry, sardonic satires.
"Those who are wise will shine as brightly as the expanse of the Heavens, and those who have instructed many in uprightousness as bright as stars for all eternity" -Daniel 12:3, NJB
Here's also what the prolific, exquisite GODy sed: 'the more you shall honor Me, the more I shall bless you' -the Infant Jesus of Prague.
Go gitt'm, girl. You're incredible. See you Upstairs. I won't be joining'm in the nasty Abyss where Isis prowls
thesuperseedoftime.blogspot.com
infowars.com
-YOUTHwitheTRUTH
-------------------------------
PS Need summore unique, uncivilized, useless names? Lemme gonna gitcha started, brudda:
Oak Woods, Franky Sparks, Athena Noble, Autumn Rose, Faith Bishop, Dolly Martin, Willow Rhodes, Cocoa Major, Roman Stone, Bullwark Burnhart, Magnus Wilde, Kardiak Arrest, Will Wright, Goldy Silvers, Penelope Summers, Sophie Sharp, Violet Snow, Lizzy Roach, BoxxaRoxx, Aunty Dotey, Romero Stark, Zacharia Neptoon, Mercurio Morrissey, Fritz & Felix Franz, Victor Payne, Isabella Silverstein, Mercedes Kennedy, Redding Rust, Phoenix Martini, Ivy Squire, Sauer Wolfe, Yankee Cooky, -blessed b9 (or mixNmatch)...
God blessa youse
(trust-N-Jesus)
-Fr. Sarducci, ol SNL